OUTLINE
Whistleblower law in New Zealand
Data privacy in New Zealand
Equal treatment for temporary agency workers in New Zealand
Anti-discrimination laws in New Zealand
Equal pay in New Zealand
Safeguard your business with our compliance expertise
There are labour laws and regulations in place to make sure workers are treated fairly and their rights are protected. When hiring in New Zealand, it’s important to follow these rules to create a fair workplace and avoid any legal issues.
The Employment Relations Act 2000 outlines important rights for employees, including fair treatment, minimum wage, leave entitlements, and the right to organise and bargain collectively. Companies must keep this in mind and incorporate them to their internal policies.
A key part of this Act is the Employee Protection Provision, which comes into play during restructuring situations to ensure employees are treated fairly during times of meaningful change within a company, such as during a sale or transfer of business.
The government has taken steps to combat exploitation, especially of vulnerable workers, including migrant workers. The Worker Protection (Migrant and Other Employees) Act 2023, which came into effect on January 6, 2024, marked a crucial step towards ensuring a safer, more equitable, and fair working environment for employees from diverse backgrounds.
To provide more protections for migrant workers as well as other employees within the workforce, this Act introduces a variety of changes across several areas of law, including the Employment Relations Act, the Immigration Act, and the Companies Act, with the primary aim of combating migrant exploitation.
One of the significant aspects of this Act is the amendments it introduces to existing laws, which include the establishment of offences and penalties tailored to address the unique challenges and vulnerabilities faced by migrant workers in the workplace.
In this guide, we delve into various employee protection laws, such as whistleblowing protection, pay equity, anti-discrimination, and more.
The process of whistleblowing in the workplace is governed by the Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers) Act 2022, which came into effect on July 1, 2022. This Act ensures that workers can easily and safely report instances of serious wrongdoing within their organisations.
Under the Act, serious wrongdoing includes any unlawful, corrupt, or irregular use of public funds or resources, conduct that poses a serious risk to public health, safety, the environment, or the maintenance of the law, and any criminal offences that could impact the public sector’s integrity.
The Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers) Act 2022 provides a framework regarding the whistleblowing process, facilitates the reporting of serious wrongdoing within organisations, and offers protection to whistleblowers against retaliation.
Those who report are assured of discretion, protection against punitive actions, and equitable treatment, in addition to legal immunity. This protection remains in place, regardless of the discloser’s accuracy in identifying actual serious misconduct. To ensure responsiveness and transparency in handling whistleblower reports, the organisation must respond within a 20-working-day window or otherwise provide a clear timeline.
The Act highlights the importance of internal reporting mechanisms but also accommodates external disclosures under specific circumstances. For example, if an employee feels that an internal report would not be effectively addressed or if the nature of the wrongdoing directly involves senior management, they are allowed to take their concerns to an external authority.
To support employers and employees in navigating the whistleblowing process, the New Zealand Ombudsman provides guidance and resources. This includes information on how to make a protected disclosure and what protections are available to whistleblowers under the law.
Employers need to ensure their data privacy policies are in compliance with New Zealand’s data privacy law, the Privacy Act 2020, and its underlying principles. These policies should protect employee personal information and to manage it responsibly.
To remain compliant, employers must keep the following considerations in mind:
It’s important to incorporate these considerations into your company’s privacy policies and ensure that all employees are aware of these policies. Any breach of the Privacy Act can lead to complaints, investigations, and even enforcement actions by the New Zealand Privacy Commissioner.
All workers, including temporary agency workers, are entitled to fair treatment under the Employment Relations Act 2000 and other employment legislation, which ensures basic employment rights and protections. Employers, including temporary work agencies, should adhere to non-discrimination policies and provide equal opportunity regardless of immigration status.
Agency workers enjoy the same rights and protections as other employees, such as receiving at least the minimum wage, holiday entitlements, and legal working hours, among other rights. To prevent exploitation and discrimination in the workplace, New Zealand’s labour laws mandate fair treatment for all employees, including temporary agency workers.
In the workplace, anti-discrimination principles are primarily governed by the Human Rights Act 1993. This act prohibits discrimination on various grounds, such as race, sex, marital status, religious belief, ethical belief, colour, age, political opinion, employment status, family status, and sexual orientation. It covers all aspects of employment, including job advertisements, recruitment, terms and conditions of employment, training, promotion, and termination.
The Employment Relations Act 2000 complements the Human Rights Act by ensuring all employees are treated fairly and can work in a safe and healthy environment free from discrimination.
Moreover, New Zealand’s Bill of Rights Act 1990 upholds the right to freedom from discrimination, strengthening the protections afforded to individuals.
Several pieces of legislation address workplace harassment, including bullying, sexual harassment, and racial harassment, to prevent and manage such behaviour. The following laws and regulations aim to create a safe and healthy environment for all employees.
All employees and applicants for employment are protected from unlawful age discrimination. The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 ensures that everyone has the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds contained in the Human Rights Act 1993.
The Human Rights Act 1993 prohibits discrimination on several grounds, including age, ensuring that individuals are treated fairly and without prejudice in various areas of life, including employment. This means that actions or policies that unfairly differentiate among individuals on the basis of age could be considered discriminatory unless they can be justified under the Act. For employment, this covers all stages of employment, from recruitment and hiring to training, promotion, and conditions of employment.
In addition, the Act specifies that discrimination occurs when someone is treated unfavourably or is subjected to a detriment that others in similar conditions do not face, or when they are denied, opportunities afforded to others, based on one of the prohibited grounds of discrimination.
Employers are expected to have clear policies in place that outline what constitutes bullying, harassment, and discrimination, and the steps the organisation will take to prevent and respond to these behaviours. This includes creating an environment where such conduct is never tolerable, and all employees are treated with respect.
When bullying, harassment, or discrimination reports arise, it is crucial for the issue to be investigated carefully, considering the perspectives of both the complainant and the person being complained about. Such investigations must be impartial, thorough, and timely to ensure fairness and respect for all parties involved.
The Equal Pay Act 1972 in New Zealand is a key piece of legislation designed to ensure that men and women are paid equally for the same work.
This was further expanded by the Equal Pay Amendment Act in 2020, which provides a clearer process for raising and resolving pay equity claims. Here’s a simple breakdown of the Act:
A pay equity claim involves addressing and correcting pay disparities for work of equal value. This means comparing jobs that are different but comparable in terms of skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions.
To raise a claim, it’s encouraged to first address the issue with the employer or through internal processes. If informal resolution doesn’t work, a formal pay equity claim can be lodged by the employee or through the union if informal resolution doesn’t work. Employers are required to review the claim and engage in discussions to assess and resolve the issue. They should provide a response and attempt to reach an agreement. This can sometimes lead to a resolution without needing formal claim procedures.
If the dispute cannot be resolved through mediation or negotiation, the claim may be taken to the Employment Relations Authority or Employment Court for a decision.
The impact of the Equal Pay Amendment Act on businesses in New Zealand can be seen in the increased focus on ensuring pay equity and reducing the gender pay gap within workplaces. Due to the introduction of this act, businesses are now more accountable for providing equal pay for work of equal value.
Employers must assess and rectify any inequities in pay that may exist, particularly in industries that predominantly employ one gender. This has a positive impact on promoting fairness and gender equality in the workplace.
The Act has also made it easier for workers to make pay equity claims. This change lowers the barriers to court action by making it a last resort, encouraging more constructive dialogue and negotiations directly between employers and employees.
Ultimately, this legislative development pushes businesses to be more proactive and diligent in examining and maintaining equitable pay practices, which can improve employee satisfaction and reduce the likelihood of legal disputes.
Understanding what you can and can’t do as an employer is one of the biggest challenges of hiring in New Zealand. Get it wrong, and you could face legal action and damage to your reputation.
Our solutions protect both you and your workers, thanks to our team’s in-depth knowledge of local and international labour laws. That means you can stop worrying about compliance issues and focus on getting the job done.
The main employee protection laws in New Zealand are the Employment Relations Act 2000, Human Rights Act 1993, Holidays Act 2003, Minimum Wage Act 1983, Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 and Privacy Act 2020.
These laws set minimum standards for employment agreements, pay, leave, discrimination, workplace safety, privacy and how employers must treat employees during the employment relationship.
Other important employee protection laws in New Zealand include the Equal Pay Act 1972, which covers equal pay and pay equity, and the Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers) Act 2022, which protects qualifying whistleblowers.
The Employment Relations Act 2000 is central to New Zealand employment relationships. It requires employers and employees to deal with each other in good faith and provides employees with ways to challenge unjustified dismissal, disadvantage and discrimination.
However, some dismissal protections are subject to statutory exceptions. For example, employees covered by a valid trial period have restricted dismissal claims. Since 21 February 2026, employees earning at least NZD 200,000 annually are also generally excluded from unjustified-dismissal protections unless they opt back in, subject to transitional rules for existing employees. There is no single Employee Protection Act in New Zealand covering all workplace rights.
Employees who report serious wrongdoing can be protected from retaliation, victimisation and legal or disciplinary action under the Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers) Act 2022.
A protected disclosure can cover serious wrongdoing such as an offence, a serious risk to public health or safety, a serious risk to an individual’s health or safety, or a serious risk to the environment.
When the Act applies, employers cannot retaliate against an employee for making a protected disclosure. The employee is also protected against being treated less favourably because they reported wrongdoing or supported another person’s disclosure.
The Act also provides confidentiality protections and immunity from civil, criminal and disciplinary proceedings for qualifying disclosures. Confidentiality is subject to limited statutory exceptions, including where disclosure is essential to investigate the matter, prevent a serious risk or comply with natural-justice requirements.
Protection is not automatic for every workplace complaint. It generally does not cover a disclosure that the person knows is false, and it does not prevent an employer from addressing unrelated misconduct or performance issues for legitimate reasons.
In summary, the whistleblower law in New Zealand protects employees who properly report serious wrongdoing from retaliation and victimisation.
The Human Rights Act 1993 protects employees and job applicants in New Zealand from discrimination on 13 prohibited grounds. These protections apply to recruitment, pay and employment conditions, training, promotion and dismissal.
The 13 prohibited grounds are:
The Employment Relations Act 2000 also allows employees to raise a personal grievance where they have been discriminated against at work. It separately protects employees against sexual harassment, racial harassment and certain forms of pressure or discrimination relating to union membership and union activities.
An employee normally cannot pursue duplicate proceedings under both the Employment Relations Act and the Human Rights Act for the same alleged discrimination. The available route, limitation period and potential remedies should therefore be considered before a claim is filed.
The Human Rights Act sets the main anti-discrimination protections, while the Employment Relations Act provides employment-specific rights and remedies.
In summary, New Zealand employers cannot discriminate against employees or job applicants on the 13 grounds protected by the Human Rights Act 1993.
Employers can monitor employees in New Zealand, but the monitoring must have a legitimate purpose and comply with the Privacy Act 2020. Employees should normally be told what is being monitored and why.
Employers may have legitimate reasons to monitor work email, internet use, devices or workplace systems. However, the information collected must be necessary for the employer’s functions, and the monitoring cannot be unfair or unreasonably intrusive.
Employers should have clear policies explaining what employees can use company systems for and what monitoring may take place. Once employee information is collected, Privacy Act requirements also apply to its storage, security, use, disclosure and retention.
Privacy expectations are higher when employees work from home. For example, New Zealand’s Privacy Commissioner says requiring a remote employee to keep their camera on continuously is likely to be unreasonably intrusive.
In summary, workplace monitoring is permitted, but employers need a genuine reason and must keep it reasonable, transparent and proportionate.
New Zealand employers must provide equal pay for men and women doing the same work and address sex-based undervaluation of female-dominated work under the Equal Pay Act 1972.
Equal pay means men and women performing the same work should receive the same pay. Pay equity goes further and considers whether female-dominated work is underpaid because of systemic sex-based undervaluation, including when compared with different work requiring comparable skills, responsibility, effort and experience.
New Zealand changed its pay equity framework in May 2025. A new pay equity claim must now relate to work that has been at least 70% female for 10 consecutive years, with reasonable grounds to believe the work has been historically and currently undervalued because of sex. The claimant must satisfy both the statutory circumstances and requirements for raising a claim and the separate merit test. An employer generally has 60 working days to decide whether the claim meets those tests, although the Act permits an extension in specified circumstances.
In summary, New Zealand law covers both equal pay for the same work and pay equity for qualifying female-dominated occupations.
Agency workers in New Zealand raise a personal grievance with their employer and may seek to have a controlling third party joined to the proceedings when that party’s conduct caused or contributed to the grievance.This is known as triangular employment. A common example is an employee hired by a recruitment or labour-hire agency and assigned to work for another company. The agency is the employer, while the client company directs the employee’s daily work.
If the client company’s actions contribute to bullying, harassment, discrimination or another personal grievance, it can be added to the employee’s claim.
The Employment Relations Authority can also divide remedies between the employer and the controlling third party according to their responsibility for the problem. The employer and controlling third party must also deal with each other in good faith when resolving the grievance. This means using an agency does not automatically shield the company directing the worker from employment claims.
The Worker Protection (Migrant and Other Employees) Act 2023 protects migrant workers by strengthening enforcement against exploitation, increasing employers’ record-keeping obligations and introducing penalties for immigration-related employment breaches.
Migrant workers have the same minimum employment rights as other New Zealand employees, including minimum wage, holidays, written employment agreements and other statutory entitlements. Instead of issuing an infringement notice, a Labour Inspector may seek a penalty from the Employment Relations Authority of up to NZD 10,000 for an individual or NZD 20,000 for a company or other corporate body for each breach.
The Act gives Labour Inspectors stronger enforcement powers. Employers must provide requested employment records within 10 working days. Failure to comply can result in a NZD 1,000 infringement fee per offence, up to NZD 20,000 within three months.
Employers can also face penalties and restrictions for employing migrant workers in breach of their visa conditions.
The Act has applied since 6 January 2024 and works alongside New Zealand’s existing employment and immigration laws.
Under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, businesses must protect the health and safety of employees and other workers so far as is reasonably practicable.
In New Zealand, the Act uses the term PCBU, Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking, for the business or organisation holding the primary health and safety duty.
A PCBU must provide a safe work environment and safe systems of work. It must identify and manage workplace risks, provide appropriate facilities and give workers the information, training, instruction and supervision needed to work safely. Businesses must also monitor workplace conditions and worker health where this is necessary to prevent work-related injury or illness.
These responsibilities can also cover contractors and other workers whose activities the business influences or directs.
In summary, health and safety under labour law in New Zealand is an active duty to identify risks and prevent harm, not simply a requirement to have a safety policy.
Employers that breach employee protection laws in New Zealand can face financial penalties, wage arrears, compensation, reinstatement orders and restrictions on employing migrant workers. The amount depends on which law was breached.
For example, Labour Inspectors can issue NZD 1,000 infringement fees for specific record-keeping breaches, with infringement fees reaching NZD 20,000 within a three-month period. Serious employment breaches can be taken to the Employment Relations Authority or Employment Court.
Health and safety breaches can be much more serious. Under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, a company can face a fine of up to NZD 3 million for reckless conduct exposing someone to a risk of serious injury, illness or death. Individuals can also face imprisonment for the most serious offences. For reckless conduct, an officer of a PCBU or an individual who is a PCBU can face up to five years’ imprisonment, a fine of up to NZD 600,000, or both. Another individual can face up to five years’ imprisonment, a fine of up to NZD 300,000, or both. Lower maximum penalties apply to other health and safety offences.
Employment-standard breaches can also prevent employers from supporting migrant work visa applications for a specified period.
In summary, New Zealand employment breaches can create both financial liability and restrictions on an employer’s ability to hire.
CXC helps global companies reduce employment compliance risks in New Zealand by combining local EOR expertise with more than 30 years of experience managing international workforces.
As the local Employer of Record, CXC manages key employment responsibilities including compliant contracts, onboarding, payroll and PAYE, KiwiSaver, statutory leave and benefits, employee records and offboarding.
CXC also supports businesses when more complex employee issues arise, such as performance management, grievances, disciplinary matters and termination. This helps companies follow New Zealand requirements rather than applying employment practices from another country.
For enterprise employers operating across multiple markets, CXC provides local expertise within a consistent global workforce model, making it easier to manage employees as the business expands.
With our EoR solution, you can engage workers anywhere in the world, without putting your business at risk. No more worrying about local labour laws, tax legislation or payroll customs — we’ve got you covered.
DISCLAIMER: The information contained on this website is provided for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal, tax, or other professional advice on any subject matter. While we endeavor to ensure that the content is accurate and up to date, we make no warranties or representations of any kind regarding the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability of the information contained herein. The content on this site is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice. Users should not act or refrain from acting based on any information on this website without seeking the appropriate legal, tax, or other professional advice tailored to their specific circumstances from qualified professionals. We expressly disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this website. Use of the information on this site does not create an attorney-client, tax advisor-client, or any other professional-client relationship between the user and the website or its authors.